点击经济学人/经济学人杂志查看全部经济学人文章

一、经济学人杂志双语文章摘要

问题是价值投资的结果很糟糕。如果你十年前买了价值1美元的价值股,那么今天卖出能收回2.5美元,而股市整体是3.45美元,不包括价值股是4.65美元。巴菲特的伯克希尔·哈撒韦公司(Berkshire Hathaway)已严重落后。尽管价值投资努力实现现代化,但其投资组合往往着眼于过去,因此基本上错过了科技股的崛起。正如我们本周的特别报道所解释的那样,资产管理行业的商业模式正面临压力。如今,它最悠久的理念之一也遭遇围攻。

二、经济学人杂志双语文章中英对照翻译

Beyond Buffett 超越巴菲特

2020.12


The agonies of traditional value investing are a sign of frothy stockmarkets—and a changing economy
传统的价值投资策略遭遇的痛苦是股市泡沫的一个信号,但也反映了经济形态的变化

经济学人在线阅读

FOR A MOMENT in November investors could afford to ignore stockmarket superstars like Amazon and Alibaba. As news of a vaccine broke, a motley crew of more jaded firms led Wall Street higher, with the shares of airlines, banks and oil firms soaring on hopes of a recovery. The bounce has been a long time coming. So-called value stocks, typically asset-heavy firms in stodgy industries, have had a decade from hell, lagging behind America’s stockmarket by over 90 percentage points. This has led to a crisis of confidence among some fund managers, who wonder if their framework for assessing firms works in the digital age. They are right to worry: it needs upgrading to reflect an economy in which intangibles and externalities count for more.
上个月有一刻,投资者可以暂时放心地忽略亚马逊和阿里巴巴这样的股市超级明星。随着一种疫苗问世的消息曝出,一群各色各样的更乏味的公司领涨了华尔街:航空公司、银行和石油公司因有望复苏而股价飙升。这一反弹实在用了太长的时间。所谓的价值型股票——通常是最传统行业的重资产公司——已经经历了地狱般的十年,落后美国股市90多个百分点。这在一些基金经理中引发了信心危机,他们怀疑自己用以评估公司的框架在数字时代是否还管用。他们的担心不无道理:框架需要升级,才能反映一个无形资产和外部性更重要的经济。
For almost a century the dominant ideology in finance has been value investing. It has evolved over time but typically takes a conservative view of firms, placing more weight on their assets, cashflows and record, and less on their investment plans or trajectory. The creed has its roots in the 1930s and 1940s, when Benjamin Graham argued that investors needed to move on from the pre-1914 era, during which capital markets were dominated by railway bonds and insider-dealing. Instead he proposed a scientific approach of evaluating firms’ balance-sheets and identifying mispriced securities. His disciple, Warren Buffett, popularised and updated these ideas as the economy shifted towards consumer firms and finance in the late 20th century. Today measures of value are plugged into computers which hunt for “factors” that boost returns and there are investors in Shanghai loosely inspired by a doctrine born in Depression-era New York.
将近一个世纪以来,金融业的主导思想是价值投资。它随着时间的推移而演变,但通常仍以保守的眼光看待公司,更重视它们的资产、现金流和过往表现,而不是投资计划或走势。这一信条源于上世纪三四十年代,当时本杰明·格雷厄姆(Benjamin Graham)认为,投资者要走出1914年前的时代,那时的资本市场由铁路债券和内幕交易主宰。他转而提出了一种科学的方法来评估企业的资产负债表,鉴别出定价错误的证券。在20世纪末经济向消费企业和金融转移时,他的信徒巴菲特普及并更新了这些观点。今天,衡量价值的指标被放进计算机中,追寻能提升回报的“因素”。诞生于大萧条时代的纽约的信条多少启发了今天上海的投资者。
The trouble is that value investing has led to poor results. If you had bought value shares worth $1 a decade ago, they would fetch $2.50 today, compared with $3.45 for the stockmarket as a whole and $4.65 for the market excluding value stocks. Mr Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway has lagged behind badly. Despite its efforts to modernise, value investing often produces backward-looking portfolios and as a result has largely missed the rise of tech. The asset-management industry’s business model is under strain, as our special report this week explains. Now one of its most long-standing philosophies is under siege, too.
问题是价值投资的结果很糟糕。如果你十年前买了价值1美元的价值股,那么今天卖出能收回2.5美元,而股市整体是3.45美元,不包括价值股是4.65美元。巴菲特的伯克希尔·哈撒韦公司(Berkshire Hathaway)已严重落后。尽管价值投资努力实现现代化,但其投资组合往往着眼于过去,因此基本上错过了科技股的崛起。正如我们本周的特别报道所解释的那样,资产管理行业的商业模式正面临压力。如今,它最悠久的理念之一也遭遇围攻。
Value investors might argue that they are the victims of a stockmarket bubble and that they will thus be proved right eventually. The last time value strategies did badly was in 1998-2000, before the dotcom crash. Today stockmarkets do indeed look expensive. But alongside this are two deeper changes to the economy that the value framework is still struggling to grapple with.
价值投资者可能会争辩说,他们是股市泡沫的受害者,因此最终会证明他们是正确的。价值策略上一次表现糟糕是在1998年至2000年,也就是互联网泡沫破灭前夕。今天的股票市场看起来确实很贵,但与此同时经济也发生了两大更深层次的变化,而价值框架仍疲于应付。
The first is the rise of intangible assets, which now account for over a third of all American business investment—think of data, or research. Firms treat these costs as an expense, rather than an investment that creates an asset. Some sophisticated institutional investors try to adjust for this but it is still easy to miscalculate how much firms are reinvesting—and firms’ ability to reinvest heavily at high rates of return is crucial for their long run performance. On a traditional definition, America’s top ten listed firms have invested $700bn since 2010. On a broad one, the figure is $1.5trn or more. Intangible firms can also often scale up quickly and exploit network effects to sustain high profits.
首先是无形资产的崛起,目前占美国商业投资的三分之一以上,比如数据,或研究。企业将这些成本列为一种支出,而不是一种会创造资产的投资。一些老练的机构投资者试着适应这一点,但还是很容易误判企业的再投资规模,而企业以高回报率大规模再投资的能力对其长期业绩至关重要。按照传统定义,美国前十大上市公司自2010年以来已经投资了7000亿美元。而以宽泛的定义,这个数字是1.5万亿美元,甚至更多。无形资产丰富的企业通常也能迅速扩大规模,利用网络效应维持高利润。
The second change is the rising importance of externalities, costs that firms are responsible for but avoid paying. Today the value doctrine suggests you should load up on car firms and oil producers. But these firms’ prospects depend on the potential liability from their carbon footprint, the cost of which may rise as emissions rules tighten and carbon taxes spread.
第二个变化是外部性越来越重要,这是指企业应当承担但躲避支付的成本。今天,价值信条认为你应该买入汽车和石油公司的股票。但这些公司的前景取决于它们对自身碳足迹的潜在责任,而随着排放规则收紧和碳税扩展,碳足迹的成本可能会上升。
Value investing’s rigour and scepticism are as relevant as ever—especially given how frothy markets look. But many investors are still only just beginning to get their heads round how to assess firms’ intangible assets and externalities. It is a laborious task, but getting it right could give asset management a new lease of life and help ensure that capital is allocated efficiently. In the 1930s and 1940s Graham described how the old investing framework had become obsolete. Time for another upgrade.
价值投资的严谨和怀疑态度一如既往地重要,尤其是在今天市场看起来泡沫满溢之际。但许多投资者才刚刚开始了解如何评估企业的无形资产和外部性。这是一项艰巨的任务,但做好这一点可以让资产管理业焕发新生,并帮助确保资本被有效配置。在上世纪三四十年代,格雷厄姆阐述了旧的投资框架如何已经过时。是时候再升级一次了。

经济学人杂阅读

三、翻译园地-although, though区别

(1) 作为连词,这两个词常可以换用。
They are a nice family, although/though I don't like young Sandra much.
他们是一个很好的家庭,虽然我不是很喜欢年轻的桑德拉。
(2) 但两者也有不同:though在日常口语或不太正式的写作中更常用,可作连词和副词用;although只可用作连词,可用于各种场合。Although the murder of the Archduke was the immediate cause of the First World War, the real reasons for the conflict were very much more complicated. 虽然谋杀大公爵是爆发第一次世界大战的直接原因,但这场冲突的真正原因却要复杂得多。
I'd quite like to go out, although/though it is a bit late.
我很想出去,虽然有点晚了。
You can count on him, though. 你倒是可以信赖他。
It seems to me though that he is running a serious risk in doing a thing like this. 在我看来他做这样一件事情倒是在冒极大的风险。
(3) though常可与even或as连用(even though, as though) 进行强调,although则不可。Even though I didn't understand a word, I kept smiling.
虽然一个词也不懂,我还是不停地笑着。

Davy and my father acted as though nothing had happened.
戴维和我父亲表现得好像什么也没发生似的。
(4) though可用来引起部分倒装的让步状语从句,although则不可。
Exhausted though she was, there was no hope of her being able to sleep.
虽然她疲惫不堪,可她还是不能够入睡。
(5) though作副词,可以放在句末,意为“然而,不过,可是”。
It was a quiet party; I had a good time, though.
这是一场平静的聚会,不过,我还是玩得很愉快。
(6) 在较长的句子中,though也可放在其他位置。
The strongest argument, though, is Britain's economic and political dependence on the United States.
但是最有力的论据是英国在经济和政治上对于美国的依赖。
(7) though, although连接的两个短句,不能再用but。如不能说: Though she was not very well, but she went to work. (though和 but两者应去一个。)但如有三个短句,则可以。这原则就是:连接两个短句,只需一个连词,而两个连词可以用来连接三个短句。Although she was not very well, she went to work, but she didn't stay there long. 虽然她身体欠佳,她还是去上班了,但她在那里没待多长时间。

以上就是Economist: Beyond Buffett-经济学人杂志在线阅读的全部内容有关金融翻译流程和翻译价格,可咨询全球博译金融翻译部 010-80757526 或 直接点击下方的“立即咨询”联系在线客服。